Under engine balance pipe

Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
143
Country flag
I do not post here very often, but have been a member for many years. I have owned my Commando for over 40 years, have rebuilt the bike a couple of times and I thought I knew commandos fairly well, but since joining I have learnt a lot by reading some of the great posts on this forum.
Over the years there have been some that have posted rubbish, or done their best to upset other members. Who can forget Carbonfibre or more recently Phil Yates. Recently Jerry created the Pub section for rubbish posts, or posts not specifically related to our Norton. If the individuals that continually hijacked threads posted in the pub section no one would complain.
With regard to the “Under engine balance pipe” thread we have seen what may be a great thread hijacked again. We had someone there that started a thread that could have gone somewhere. Unfortunately the original poster has deleted his posts. The hijacker has imparted his great knowledge that “a balance pipe coming off at right angles to a header pipe is bullshit”. If he had read prior posts and threads concerning the cross pipe he might have learnt something. And of course he has asserted that Ludwig has never contributed anything constructive.
Ludwig has never posted other than helpful information. Thanks to Ludwig the air trap at the front of my Commando head has been rectified. Worth an oil cooler as Ludwig put it. A couple of months ago I replaced my valve guide oil seals without removing the head. It went very well by following the instructions posted by Ludwig. I look forward to every Ludwig post. After 40 years of Norton ownership I am still open to learn from knowledgeable people.

Aco has posted more often than most. I have learnt that Aco used to race a Triumph (I think that is mentioned in every second post of his) but he now has a Norton. Aco’s Norton did not have enough torque so he advanced a combat cam by 15 degrees, (no not a couple of degrees but 15 degrees), which greatly increased his torque. But then he fitted a 6 speed box because his power band was still so narrow, and then on the track he never revs the bike beyond 6500. The only time I ever saw Aco ask advice was with regard to a dyno. He got some very good advice on how to tune his bike on the dyno. I wonder if he ever tried his bike on the dyno after advancing that cam. And more recently I found out that Aco decreases the trail of his front end by decreasing the offset of the triple trees, which of course is exactly the opposite to every other Norton, or any bike for that matter. rake-and-trail-specs-t12097-60.html?hilit=trail

If Aco were to post exclusively in the Pub then we would not have as much reason to complain. Otherwise I can see him following Carbonfibre and Phil. Can’t happen soon enough as far as I am concerned.

A wise man once said it is better to say nothing and have people think that you might be a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it.

Had my bitch for the day, sorry folks
ando
 
Ando, go into your profile and add the names of the posts you do not want to see into your foes box, their posts will not not be seen. I read the balance pipe thread and did not see a single off topic post. Pity the original poster did not have this setup in place as then he would have been oblivious as me ;) .
 
kommando said:
Pity the original poster did not have this setup in place as then he would have been oblivious as me ;) .

However, the OP didn't delete the content of his posts because he had become annoyed with any particular individual, but because part of the thread (now deleted) highlighted some possible anomalies or errors in the graph data, (and I think the PO was also concerned about breaking copyright rules by posting the two graphs from a certain classic magazine) as a result, I deleted that section of the discussion because the remaining posts no longer made sense once the OP had removed the content from his posts.
 
A whole swathe of posts gone, and we only find out about it in the pub ? !
And not even a little note there to explain.

L.A.B. said:
I deleted that section of the discussion because the remaining posts no longer made sense once the OP had removed the content from his posts.

Some folks might say that some posters have no content and never make any sense,
and you have never done anything before !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Rohan said:
A whole swathe of posts gone, and we only find out about it in the pub ? !
And not even a little note there to explain.

Of the twelve posts deleted, five were by the OP who'd already signalled his intention to delete the content in his last post where he also requested that I tidy up the thread, as the other posts belonged to you and me and had come and gone in a relatively short space of time, I thought that mentioning anything about it (without going into a detailed explanation) would only serve to bewilder those who hadn't caught that part brief of the discussion.


Rohan said:
Some folks might say that some posters have no content and never make any sense,
and you have never done anything before !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, that's an entirely different matter in my opinion.
 
For what its worth, I would also like to go on record here in saying that ACETROLL (sorry if I got that spelling wrong) was quite out of order in taking and unnecessary swipe at Ludwig.

As Ando says, Ludwigs posts are always of the greatest interest IMHO. Ludwig belongs to that club who have owned their machines for a long period, and who use them hard, and often, and modify them accordingly. His posts are amongst the most concise and informative on here.

Perhaps AN needs a dedicated "Triumph E3134 Camshaft" Forum... where ACETROLL can wax lyrical in comfort...
 
Rohan said:
A whole swathe of posts gone, and we only find out about it in the pub ? !
And not even a little note there to explain.
L.A.B. said:
Of the twelve posts deleted, five were by the OP who'd already signalled his intention to delete the content in his last post where he also requested that I tidy up the thread, as the other posts belonged to you and me and had come and gone in a relatively short space of time, I thought that mentioning anything about it (without going into a detailed explanation) would only serve to bewilder those who hadn't caught that part brief of the discussion.

Would have been a nice courtesy to leave a little note, to say posts have been deleted - because of inaccurate data, etc.
Even the NOC Forum moderator sometimes does that.

Been a lot of requests to delete trashy, and irrelevant, posts over the eons, you setting a precedent here !??
We look forward to the new improved forum look.....
 
Rohan said:
Would have been a nice courtesy to leave a little note, to say posts have been deleted - because of inaccurate data, etc.
Even the NOC Forum moderator sometimes does that.

Well there you go, you said it yourself, "sometimes"!
I've already given my reasons for purposely not mentioning that a number of posts had been removed, so as far as I'm concerned that puts an end to the matter.


Rohan said:
Been a lot of requests to delete trashy, and irrelevant, posts over the eons, you setting a precedent here !??
We look forward to the new improved forum look.....

Nothing has changed or will be changing as far as I'm concerned, and posting sarcastic comments is neither helpful or constructive.
 
If you fixed the reason for the 'sarcastic' comments, it would be both very helpful AND very constructive.
A lot of folks have suggested similar, over the years. (?).
Would improve the forum, considerably.

Maybe you don't get paid enough for that to happen though ?

Frankly, I'm a bit p****d off that you deleted my posts, without a single word of explanation.
Not a quality effort, I'd suggest.
 
Rohan said:
If you fixed the reason for the 'sarcastic' comments, it would be both very helpful AND very constructive.

You will have to explain "fixed the reason"?


Rohan said:
A lot of folks have suggested similar, over the years. (?).
Would improve the forum, considerably.

Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about?


Rohan said:
Maybe you don't get paid enough for that to happen though ?

Paid? What!! :?:

Rohan said:
Frankly, I'm a bit p****d off that you deleted my posts, without a single word of explanation.
Not a quality effort, I'd suggest.

Sorry you feel that way, but I really didn't see any point in leaving those posts (both yours and mine) that no longer made sense once the OP had deleted the content from his posts.
 
L.A.B. said:
Sorry you feel that way, but I really didn't see any point in leaving those posts (both yours and mine) that no longer made sense once the OP had deleted the content from his posts.

A little note or a PM would have been nice.
But if you don't get paid......
 
As Les has said, it was getting very confusing and anyone searching and finding the thread in the future could have been (confused). I certainly didn't have any issues with anyone but it was getting a bit deep. Saw Rohan's curve reversal and yes its spot on with a typical 850. Apologies for mixing up the data, it just seemed a good idea at the time!!
 
Back
Top