Fast Eddie
VIP MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Messages
- 21,594
NKN said:Mark said:Inadequate quality control processes.NKN said:On the other side, did other buyers needed to file it before mounting?
A lack of attention to detail, the machinist should have caught that.
Towner said:but the poorly made threaded holes would annoy me as well.
Ouch, for at least two of you, I'm not that excessive and demanding :roll: Perhaps we should meet, you deserve a fresh beer
BTW thanks for "straight" reading, understanding and answering following the thread spirit.
For others:
Towner said:All this dents at the fins would be no problem for me
Fast Eddie said:But as for the other 'issues' ...
Matchless said:Perhaps the only way to make the casting perfect is to die cast them.
Fast Eddie said:The issue regarding casting imperfections in FA heads have been raised here before. The thing is though, what is an imperfection? Especially on a sand casted process? Basically, there is no such thing as a perfect sand casted component.
lcrken said:No insult intended, but I think you might have unrealistic expectations for the quality you get from even a very good sand casting.
Ken
Looks like I might have been misunderstood because I am not complaining about cosmetic. Just take time to read again, because I don't think it's about my little English this time:
Just received # 164 FullAuto, first impressions is that I like the new old look. What I'm trying to say is that even if brand new, it has some cosmetic "defects" that make it look like a NOS part. Fins are not all exactly perfectly the same just like on a RD 400 for example AND I LIKE IT LIKE THAT. Also for that, but not only of course.
Read again, it was done ;-)Onder said:Maybe better to ask the seller these questions first. After all you did buy it from him and not from us.
And as I said here:
[...] Also for that, but not only of course.
OK it is in a very few words, but it is what I'm thinking. So thanks to the followers that have helped me describing it and saving me some time consuming in translating, I totally agree with those ones:
Fast Eddie said:The head looks dreadful.
Matchless said:overall it is far better than any original Norton twin head I have ever seen.
cjandme said:but the improved flow and better aluminum alloy used in making them, seems worth the cost in my book. I believe that we are all lucky that they are even available to us in this day and age. I remember a time when you really had to scrounge for parts, now it's a smorgasbord, from cranks to lighter pistons & longer rods to electric start replacement primary's , belt drive options, complete replacement TTi gear boxes, new cylinder heads, new brake kits, rear set foot control options, digital clocks, improved rear swing arms, etc...etc...etc... there has never been a better time to own and ride a Norton
lcrken said:Compared to a stock Norton head, the quality of these is far superior. You're looking at what are really minor cosmetic details that have no effect on function. I have no doubt that Ken could produce something that would be close to perfect, even by your standards, but to do so would require more detailed inspection and the resultant scrapping of many heads. If you scrap half the heads to ensure a higher level of artistic perfection, you have to at least double the price. Not realistic for this market. I agree that the threads don't look that nice, but probably work just fine for their purpose. Being a little compulsive myself, I'd probably install inserts, knowing all the while that I didn't really need to.
Along with most of the other forum members here, I'm just grateful to Ken for the time and money he's invested in making these available. I'm sure his return on investment is still ridiculously low, so it's clearly a labor of love.
Ken
Voilà voilà, have a nice day.
My offer to take it off of your hands, still stands !!