timing side mainshaft bearing different?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
131
Country flag
Anybody notice the original timing side mainshaft bearing has smaller balls and thicker sidewall than replacement? ( '71 Commando). Different side load / carrying capacity? Significant?
Doug
timing side mainshaft bearing different?
 
Doug,

Would you want to run balls or convert to latter spec roller bearings? Probably the time to put in super belnds, but you will need to adjust end float.

Cheers richard
 
Are we talking crank or gearbox here?

I am going to gamble on gearbox, so I would say that a good quality ball replacement will be just fine. No particular load here other than the normal requirements. No history of quirky failures that I am aware of .
 
Don't know where you are, but I trusted Mick Hemmings with all my gearbox bearings and no shimming. No rollers, ball. Up to you.

Dave
69S
 
Don't know. But I do know drive side mainshaft takes way more forces than the timing side ,and that's why I have fitted a big roller bearing in there. And you all know my thoughts on replacing all layshaft bearings with roller equivalent as a safety concern. Peter.
 
I've had heavy-duty ball bearings fail on the timing side twice--first with original bearings 3000 miles from new--and then again with a premium, extra-ball bearing that destroyed the cages and pounded the balls into deformed pellets. I have never had a Superblend bearing fail in the engine or gearbox on my mega-mile Combat


Tim Kraakevik
kraakevik@voyager.net
 
Okay, so we are talking gearbox, I missed that sorry. I have only fitted the ball bearing types. Just done my gearbox, replaced 1st gear bush etc. And the TS side balll was rough. But rollers would not control endfloat, and maybe load up the circlip on the DS of the mainshaft? So how do control mainshaft endfloat?

Richard
 
Could it be as it's an imperial size bearing and it's cost effective to it make like that :roll:

Cash
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top