Ken Stellite Delchrome C is on the drawing and has been since the late 50's, I read the drawing in 2015, so I did not just find out about it two weeks ago, and my previous posts in other threads saying that it has always been Delchrome makes you out to look stupid in your response to suggest I only found out 2 weeks ago. The way you read into things is like you are on a different planet. Stellite was the company that the Delchrome C was bought from - can you not see this. If you think it is stellite, then that is so easily determined, even your engine builders chemistry report said 'Ferrous' not Cobalt, why not spend the rest of your pent up frustration proving me wrong to try and find one that has Cobalt in it, and not a refaced one at that.
As for quality control, your heads were not great, the porting works well, but that is about it, some of the issue I have spotted have spotted by others as well. I will not discuss the failings as we may end up in competition with STS, or did you forget to tell them we had a quote done like you did to Bushell, but seeing as you were a supplier at the time we decided to not enter into competition with you and just accept the numbers that we were going to get delivered, not the numbers we ordered. We are waiting to see what STS produce and at what cost. Having read this, no doubt STS will ring me next week, they have my number as they have rang me in the past prior to buying your patterns about gears. Something tells me they will not be happy.
I gained my qualifications in the Royal Navy as an weapon engineering artificer, these qualifications directly relate to the RAN as many RN engineers I know have ended up there. Also some none engineering qualifications ones as well, small arms armourer, weapon instructor, range supervisor and Ships Command protection adviser as well, from what I have seen on the web you may relate to some of these qualifications as well. And if you wish to challenge my engineering qualification I have told you how to do so through the globally recognised Engineering Council of the UK.
With the inventory we have and just me to resolve issues it is a huge task and not one that could be easily undone after years of changes by some that did not think to check the mating part / parts. Even some of the drawings from 1974/5 are not correct, a period of no money, drawings were changed and the parts never made from them at the time.
Considering you have the attitude of someone who is always right, one day you might just contribute something useful to this forum, instead of being so negative, no wonder you gave up so easily on your cylinder head and sold it, or did the failings of it dawn on you.