Fascinating! I dig on this kinda stuff. I like the final closing disclaimer; "Further verification studies on production feasibility, oil consumption, blow-by, durability and scuffing are required." I'll bet!
On page 1, there's the value "Crank ratio (L/r) 3.5". Does this equate "rod-to-stroke" ratio? If that's the case, then all bets are off, as the Norton (at least, the 850) has a R/S ratio of 1.68. Assuming that's the case in their studies, the rod angle would be drastically less than "real world" engines. I suppose the argument could be made that, if the results are that obvious on their test mule, it should be even better in the Norton. My fear, though, is that with the increased rod angles in the Norton and the associated elevated side-loads, is that the oil would be more inclined to be squished out with any sort of recesses in the piston that would decrease its bearing surface.
Steve, are you ready to sacrifice a set of pistons and bore to see? Maybe one stock piston, and one with the cutouts. I would, but she's running too good right now to think of taking her apart!
Nathan