kommando said:Les Emery took over development, 'would not touch with a long wooden implement' comes to mind.
Rohan said:True.
But we can stll dream of a wonderful torquey Commando motor,
that will also turn 12,000 rpms. !
How short stroke would a Commando have to go to be able to turn 12,000 rpm,
we wonder. ??
Without getting out the back of an evelope...
Nater_Potater said:While the DOHC is cool, I'd be more interested in the four-valve-per-cylinder head for the reasons Jim points out. Does anyone make a pushrod variant?
Nater_Potater said:While the DOHC is cool, I'd be more interested in the four-valve-per-cylinder head for the reasons Jim points out. Does anyone make a pushrod variant?
Rohan said:True.
But we can stll dream of a wonderful torquey Commando motor,
that will also turn 12,000 rpms. !
How short stroke would a Commando have to go to be able to turn 12,000 rpm,
we wonder. ??
Without getting out the back of an evelope...
Fullauto said:If you REALLY want that, then buy a modern Ducati. All you asked for and more and at a fraction of the cost.
acotrel said:Rohan said:True.
But we can stll dream of a wonderful torquey Commando motor,
that will also turn 12,000 rpms. !
How short stroke would a Commando have to go to be able to turn 12,000 rpm,
we wonder. ??
Without getting out the back of an evelope...
Would you personally attempt to ride it ? I would never stroke a big twin down to less than 75mm. It would probably cop 12,000 RPM if the valve gear kept up. You wouldn't have the case and bearings problem in the bottom end. DO IT ! - A 750cc Paton ?
The way to go might be to look at the Nourish Weslake Triumph head and work out how large you can make the bores , then stroke the commando motor to get 750cc, and make barrels and crank to suit. If the Weslake combustion chamber is too narrow, you might end up with a good squish band. There is an 80s Triumph thunderbird which has a steel one-piece 75mm stroke crank.
http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/ ... 20tr65.htm