You can see the problems of rideing 11 / 10ths .
Traffic for one . Kidding oneself . ??
Essentially my machines were primarilly used as TRANSPORT . On ROADS . Now ; Race Tracks of our Road Race type are seldom as undulateing and uneven .
Therefore the priority was always Roadholding . The old dunger Bonneville didnt have problems there dealing with rice burners , though a competantly riden Italian sausage wasnt used as a corner guide. Wernt considering our chassis ridgidity to match .
A brisk cruise is ordinarilly enough to deal with a entusiastically riden wriggler . Traffic light Grand Prixs may be another thing . Still it'd hold em .
Kwakersikis bonus scheme , cheap bikes , and kamakazi brigade combined with the britsish industrial collapse of the 70s ( by 74 ) meant they wernt availabe
and the skill level required in the antipodes wasnt readilly available . seeing robbie Dean in PR assumedly in 77 at New Lynn open Production on a circuit that is presumeably point & squirt , saw him finishing 4th Clanking away on the hot day , after haveing held second before discretion assured he tame his lurid tendancies . He was a pretty rough backwood cowboy , in my books . Determined aggressive experianced but not entirely endowed with finnesse , mechanically or with retraint. Whowever , His was the hottest Commando round , on the tracks .And under favourable conditions could clean up on his home track in the 70s . Conversly ' favourable ' could also be applied to conditions for those that beat him . If we wish to view all dispassionately .
Again . New Fresh whizz bangs & in some cases a better budget . OR , the Crux of the Matter . redilly availabe of the shelf , with spares back up AND
skilled tuners advice near freely at hand . Some of these were also a bit basic. Like a two stroke . The survival statistics for the protogges of some
arnt encourageing .Or at least of some consideration if one trys to be rational .
NOT getting into the Reasons for the decilne of the European makes / or the Shift of Balance in Global Supplies . The prime Factor was availability .
And with Two Strokes , the use of a Barometer . The scientific aura dispensed by the white coats and knowing ( we hope ) studies. Significantly at major races ( in the states ) the exactitude of the jetting was often off . Hence race casualties . Good News . pistons are higly profitable .
SO , we get to the tecnological Back up . Kawasaki Heavy Industries . a behemouth .
thart . Our friendly faschist ' Asked after haveing taken his wizz bang for a spin " wots the best bike youve ever ridden " Mortally offened , derissive & condescending when I suggested something else . It was to soggy & gutless for me . Not being a throttle merchant , responce for fine control to maintain equilibrium is more a requirement .
Granted , race Kawaskis may have been fast. On a Race Track . Road conditions with undulateing , ridged , irregular surfaces are usually there undoing . And anyones who takes no heed of them. Nevertheless there are thoose that say that that is of no relevance;at the speeds they ride . :?
More ways than one to go about a ' Commando ' Chassis . But that goes for all . Smart / sheene etc etc went Seely etc etc for their rice burner race chassises . Not without good reason .
As far as outputs go , do you trust anyones . And peak figure is the least of it .In the context of a sports / road / clubmans type machine ( watch someone twist this ) A big baggage hauler , cappacity ( a pulling power ( Tourque ) rules .
Both Tourque & HP one has to get to the ground . As Jaws wee whizzer does nodubtably . But through a 100 mph plus curveing undulation with sufficent
inclination to fully deflect the suspension , Id prefer to be elsewhere .
The Triton . Which blew of the TZs ( Mock horror consternation disbelief and RETRIBUTION in certain quaters ) would flex writhe and twitch.To a mild degree ) its runs were 2/3 of a TR750 of the same tube diameter . As a test chasssis , due for replacement with a uprated version of the same configuration , it had proved its geometry was suficent for the Job .Outmanourvering jap barges .
NOT being a Jap motorcycle entusiast ( production enginnering of commercially drived nature ) is displeaseing to a trianed eye in the hand built tradition of craftsment. THOUGH some of there competition based machineary obtains comparable standards . Low build hand fitted .
In the vain of Aircraft Fitter / rigger . standards . Not many of which were about by the 70s . in Aus.
ALSO here the climate is less disposed to old Iron Barreled behemouths .But largely it was AVAILABILITY.
across the board .
( more snarky comments expected here .0
Noteably im no more impressed with current British mass produced consumer products. And the Evo Harleys looked like XL125s .
IN ENGINEERING PRODUTION TERMS .
So .in 70 the Old Velo MT 500 5001 was still capeable of upsetting the equilibrium in NZ, and if Coveting reqd. My Choice . then .
Dirt Roads , id probably take this .
Sealed roads , id want lightish , narrow , and someting tht'd change direction if operated correctly .
if further acts of sabotage are avoided , I may well build it . As the rideings for pleasure , and the only person Id wish to prove anything to is myself.
Even Raceing , I wouldnt run a rattling raucus gas guzzling wobbler . With the WOBBLER being in referance to its Real road capeabilities . Closest circuit comparison being 24 Hr races & IoM. WHERE our piddling little NORTON ( as per Heading 0 didnt do to bad at all . Despite being operated by a pack of incompatent Poms . :mrgreen: